<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www2.sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'Windows 2012'</title><link>http://www2.sqlblog.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Windows+2012&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'Windows 2012'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>Is the SAN dying???</title><link>http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/2012/12/11/is-the-san-dying.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:55:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:46614</guid><dc:creator>RickHeiges</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is the SAN dying?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The reason that I ask this question is that MSFT has unleashed technologies this year that point in that direction&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Always ON Availability Groups shuns shared storage&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Windows 2012 has Storage Replication Technology that does not require a SAN&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Windows 2012 has Hyper-V Replica Technology that does not require a SAN&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;PDW v2 continues to reinforce the approach to avoid shared storage&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not saying that SAN technology does not have its place or does not have benefits inherent to the beast.&amp;nbsp; I'm just pointing out that MSFT has made investments in technology that diminish the need for SANs.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thoughts?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>