<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www2.sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is the SAN dying???</title><link>http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/2012/12/11/is-the-san-dying.aspx</link><description>Is the SAN dying? The reason that I ask this question is that MSFT has unleashed technologies this year that point in that direction Always ON Availability Groups shuns shared storage Windows 2012 has Storage Replication Technology that does not require</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: Is the SAN dying???</title><link>http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/2012/12/11/is-the-san-dying.aspx#46615</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 01:14:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:46615</guid><dc:creator>jchang</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;if there is any market segment that should die, it it the storage vendors, almost all of whom put out expensive crap with horrible performance. Unfortunately, people seem to like buying expensive crap with horrible performance too much to try a Windows SMB built with good Infini-band connections.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Is the SAN dying???</title><link>http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/2012/12/11/is-the-san-dying.aspx#46617</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 08:44:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:46617</guid><dc:creator>ML</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Same as VMware&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Is the SAN dying???</title><link>http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/rick_heiges/archive/2012/12/11/is-the-san-dying.aspx#46618</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:23:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:46618</guid><dc:creator>RichB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If the vendors slash their pricing they may stand a chance... but otherwise looks like the end as far as SQL Server needs go.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>