THE SQL Server Blog Spot on the Web

Welcome to SQLblog.com - The SQL Server blog spot on the web Sign in | |
in Search

Kevin Kline

SQL2005 Adoption Rate

I recently read a post from MVP Andrew Kelly about his experiences with the SQL2005 Adoption rate.  In his article, Andy relates that he asks audiences at his presentations how many of them are using SQL Server 2005.  At the PASS 2006 Community Summit last November, Andy said he encountered a 70-80% adoption rate while just a few months earlier, at Microsoft TechEd, he'd only encountered a 30-40% adoption rate.  He also expressed surprise that a developer he'd spoken to was hard at work on a new project based on SQL2000.

To add my voice to this discussion, I've been speaking at one or more local user group meeting per month across the country and I am uniformly surprised by the very low adoption rate of SQL Server 2005.  It's very common to find IT shops that have SQL2005 installed, but I'm finding that it's much less common to find IT shops where SQL2005 is the primary database platform or even the database platform of intention.

This is clearly bad news.  It's hard to tell why SQL2005 is not being implemented as widely or as quickly as expected.  The SQL2005 release is potent and a big improvement, but for some reason, it hasn't caught like wildfire. 

Now, Microsoft is making noise like it will release a beta of its next version of SQL Server within the calendar year.  In a situation like this, I believe we're looking at two possible adoption outcomes.  The first is that most users actually leapfrog past SQL2005 to SQL200x whenever that release goes RTM. 

The second scenario that I see as more likely is that SQL Server will spin out into a multi-version cosmos very much like what we have in the Oracle world today.  When I visit Oracle shops, I commonly find Oracle boxes running everything from Oracle 81 to Oracle 10g R2, and sometimes even Oracle 7.  What a support nightmare!

I believe Microsoft doesn't have a lot of options in this space.  Better marketing could help a tiny bit.  But Microsoft is already better at marketing than almost any body else in this space.  Slight changes in programs and incentives might also help, but again, Microsoft is strong in this space.  The only major impact I can envision at this point is a major groundswell in ISV support. ISVs still don't seem to fully understand or support SQL Server 2005, and there are literally thousands of them with 10's of thousands of users. Swaying them towards adoption seems to be Microsoft's best bet for ensuring a strong and widespread surge in SQL2005 adoption.

Thoughts?

Thanks,

-Kevin

Published Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:58 AM by KKline
Filed under:

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

 

MikeS said:

Kevin:  Excellent article.  I think part of the problem for SQL Server or Oracle apps is the level of effort to migrate production apps to a new back-end database version.  Too much is invested in the current version and folks are busy working on new projects and don't want to take on migration of old or existing workhorse apps.  Plus, it's challenging and risky to upgrade in-place vs. side-by-side and the more conservative and desireable (in my opion) side-by-side migration is costly (need another server and licensing).  Too much momentum for current projects to remain at old O/S, SQL and application versions even with the looming threat of mainstream desupport ending for SQL 2000 SP3a.

March 13, 2007 9:44 PM
 

KKline said:

Thanks for the comment!  

Rumor has it that Katmai (the codename of the next version of SQL Server) will ship some time in next year.  That will leave a lot of shops wondering whether they should simply skip SQL2005 and go straight to the next version.  

Microsoft's move to a faster release schedule will leave Microsoft looking a lot like Oracle.  When I go to Oracle shops (which is all the time), I find they're running everything from Oracle 8i to 10g R2.  I'm not sure if that's the kind of multiplicity that Microsoft wants.  But that's what they're certain to get with a too-fast release schedule.

Best regards,

-Kevin

March 26, 2007 12:58 PM

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(required) 
Submit

About KKline

Kevin Kline is a well-known database industry expert, author, and speaker. Kevin is a long-time Microsoft MVP and was one of the founders of PASS, www.sqlpass.org.

This Blog

Syndication

Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems
  Privacy Statement