<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www2.sqlblog.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Bin packing part 6: Further improvements</title><link>http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis/archive/2011/11/01/bin-packing-part-6-further-improvements.aspx</link><description>In part 5 of my series on the bin packing problem, I presented a method that sits somewhere in between the true row-by-row iterative characteristics of the first three parts and the truly set-based approach of the fourth part. I did use iteration, but</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)</generator><item><title>re: Bin packing part 6: Further improvements</title><link>http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/hugo_kornelis/archive/2011/11/01/bin-packing-part-6-further-improvements.aspx#39686</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 23:02:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:39686</guid><dc:creator>Ian Yates</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was browsing SQLBlog.com for the first time in a little while and saw your bin packing articles. &amp;nbsp;I remembered reading them quite a long time ago (three years I guess :P) and thought you had just reposted them. &amp;nbsp;To my pleasant surprise it was a continuation from the past.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A great series of posts! &amp;nbsp;Not an easy problem to solve and one that a human can instinctively reason about but it's very difficult, and there's clearly many ways, to transform what's &amp;quot;obvious&amp;quot; into a simple, correct and efficient algorithm.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'll be sure to keep an eye out for the next one!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>