http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/adam_machanic/archive/2011/04/28/who-is-active-s-hidden-gems-a-month-of-activity-monitoring-part-28-of-30.aspxThis post is part 28 of a 30-part series about the Who is Active stored procedure. A new post will run each day during the month of April, 2011. After April all of these posts will be edited and combined into a single document to become the basis of theenCommunityServer 2.1 SP2 (Build: 61129.1)http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/adam_machanic/archive/2011/04/28/who-is-active-s-hidden-gems-a-month-of-activity-monitoring-part-28-of-30.aspx#35356Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:45:25 GMT21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:35356Adam Machanic<p>This post is part 30 of a 30-part series about the Who is Active stored procedure. A new post will run</p> http://www2.sqlblog.com/blogs/adam_machanic/archive/2011/04/28/who-is-active-s-hidden-gems-a-month-of-activity-monitoring-part-28-of-30.aspx#35967Mon, 30 May 2011 11:07:01 GMT21093a07-8b3d-42db-8cbf-3350fcbf5496:35967Andrew Calvett <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewcalvett"><img src="http://www.linkedin.com/img/webpromo/btn_liprofile_blue_80x15.gif" width="80" height="15" border="0" alt="View Andrew Calvett's profile on LinkedIn" /></a><p>Whilst reviewing the CPU statistics of a system that i knew was CPU bound i found the numbers were not</p>